All Praise is due to Allaah who made it sufficient honour for His servants to defend the honour and integrity of the Prophets of Allaah and His Messengers and their Companions. And all praise is due to Allaah who made it sufficient disgrace and ignominy for the biased partisans that they defend and aggrandize the Mockers of the Messengers and the Slanderers of Caliphs and Companions, declaring some of them to be disbelievers, others to be pathetic and senile, and yet others guilty of deception and treachery - let alone their defence of the writings of falsehood which contain but the innovations of the Jahmiyyah, Mu'tazilah, Ash'ariyyah, Khawarij, the despicable Rafidah and others - displaying the extremism of their Irjaa' in all of that - and then affirming the affair by calling such a one to be "Shaheed" without making the exception (Istithnaa).

We present to you the some samples of the handwritten notes of both Shaikh Ibn Uthaimeen and Shaikh Salih al-Fawzaan on the book, "Baraa'ah Ulamaa il-Ummah Min Tazkiyaat Ahl ul-Bid'ah wal-Mudhammah" as well as Shaikh al-Albani's commendation and praise of Shaikh Rabee's efforts in exposing the deviation and ignorance of Sayyid Qutb.

This book is a specific refutation of those who use the intercession of Shaikh Ibn Baaz for Sayyid Qutb prior to his death as a justification for the defence of his heretical beliefs and writings.

IMPORTANT NOTE: We see that if a Qutubi reads this he will soon interject and claim:  Why do you not also take the words of Shaikh Salih al-Fawzaan or the Committee in criticism of those besides Sayyid Qutb? - then we say because all of the Ulamaa have refuted Qutb, from Imaam al-Albani, Imaam Ibn Baz, Shaikh Abdul-Muhsin al-Abbaad, Shaikh Salih al-Fawzaan, Shaikh Mahmood Shakir (as far back as 1952, when he refuted Qutb four times publicly, for his scathing attacks on the Companions - despite that he still oversaw the printing of his book of Rafd, al-Adaalah al-Ijtimaa'iyyah up until his death, and it continues to be published by his brother Mohamamd Qutb to this day, the while it is not free from revilement of some of the Companions), Shaikh Ubayd al-Jaabiree, Shaikh al-Lahaydaan, Shaikh Hammad al-Ansaree, Shaikh Rabee' Bin Haadee, Shaikh Abdullah ad-Dawaish, Shaikh Salih as-Suhaymee, Shaikh Abdul-Azeez Aal-Shaikh, let alone scores of others, both from Ahl us-Sunnah wal-Jamaa'ah, and from outside of it, such as the Innovators of Ikhwaan such as Qaradawi and the likes. There has always been a unanimous concensus on the heresy, deviation and Kharijism of Sayyid Qutb - denied only by those engrossed and infatuated with Qutubism and its ideals - but in all that while never did you show sincerity of purpose 
Oh Qutubi, and accept them and their verdicts! Rather, you bemused yourself because the proponents of Qutubism of our times labelled the above scholars as being "the scholars of womens menses and impurities", "ignorant of fiqh ul-waqi'", "the scholars of the desert" and what is worse than all of that.

But despite all of that you found fault with those who merely narrated their verdicts and who brought these verdicts to the attention of the people - advising them for the sake of Allaah - to flee from this man and his teachings, and then you reviled them and cursed them, showing anger and hatred for the sake of your sayyid, Sayyid Qutb - but you did not show hatred and anger for Moosa (alaihi-salaam) and nor for Uthmaan (radiyallaahu anhu) and nor for Bani Umayyah, and nor for the sake of the Islamic Sharee'ah when your sayyid called for parts of it to be abolished, because it is not suitable and relevant for the times - showing the extremism of your Irjaa' in all of that. So do not preach to us, O Qutubi about the verdicts of the Scholars, when you are the one's who have been most in need of such a preaching, with respect to your sayyid and his heretical beliefs and teachings, ever since 1952, when Shaikh Mahmood Shakir exposed his poisonous Rafd and exposed his heretical beliefs.

So we say, exposing the great fraud and deception of Qutubism:

ONE: Shaikh al-Albani's Written Communication to Shaikh Rabee'
This was written after the Shaikh completed a reading of 'al-Awaasim Minal-Qawaasim' shortly before his death. And this is also an uncovering of that Qutubi who used some very old words of Shaikh al-Albani to defend Sayyid Qutb and his heretical writings. It is abundantly clear that at that particular time Shaikh al-Albani had not made a thorough study of all the works of Qutb and hence did not speak in criticism of him. However, when the affair became clear to him at the hands of Shaikh Rabee' then he wrote the communication below. A translation of it can be found in Part 1 of this series.

TWO: Shaikh Salih al-Fawzaan's Adjustments to the Title
The Shaikh making some adjustments to the naming of the series and also changing the title of the book by adding the word "Wal-Mudhammah" to the end of the title.

THREE: The Letter Sent by the Compiler of the Book to the Defender of Sayyid Qutb
This is the letter sent by the compiler of this particular book (Isaam bin Abdullaah as-Sinaani) to a Qutubi who had attempted to defend Sayyid Qutb by the intercession of Imaam Ibn Baaz. Shaikh Fawzaan makes some additional notes to it. The text of the letter mentions that Qutb had very great and serious errors and that this type of reasoning only deceives the youth, who will be led astray by his heresies. Shaikh Fawzaan adds "Then, the Shaikh (i.e. Bin Baz) did that (i.e. interceded for Qutb) before it became clear from Sayyid Qutb what was clear in his books", and some other brief notes further down.

FOUR: Shaikh Salih al-Fawzaan Adjusting His Own Words
Here Shaikh Fawzaan makes a few adjustments to his own words in refutation of Adnaan Ar'oor (who is now pushing his own form of insidious Qutubism). Shaikh Fawzaan describes Qutb as a Jaahil, ignoramus, with no knowledge, and of course this is indeed true in the case of Sayyid Qutb. The translation of this is found in Part 1 of this series.

FIVE: Shaikh Ibn Uthaimeen Advising A Change Related to the Ordering of Content
Shaikh Ibn Uthaimeen asking for the section titled "The Salafi Manhaj" to be put first, before "The Qutubi Manhaj". And it is here that we confirm, once again, that Qutubism and the Qutubi Methodology is a real and tangible reality and exists - even though the well-known Qutubists of the West such as Ali Timimi and Idris Palmer have been trying to deny their own existence for numerous years. Closet-Qutubism is now officially dead. The title of the page reads "Two Ways That Do Not Meet, Separated By the East and the West", and the first three quotations are from Sayyid Qutb's 'Zilaal' in which he performs takfir of the whole of mankind and every Muslim society and also in which he says that what Islam requires is revolutions (inqilaab) in every place and location in order to forcefully impose the Sharee'ah - and that this is the highest and most lofty goal (Zilaal 3/1451) and inshaa'allaah we will translate this for all to see that this man and his writings are but the legacy of Dhul-Khuwaisarah at-Tameemi - and from Allaah is the refuge. Note, Shaikh Ibn Uthaimeen praised the book, after reading it.

Closing Remarks
It is important that the Qutubis address the issue of following the verdicts of the Salafi Ulamaa - concerning which they have had clear problems with over the last 8 years - before they begin to display love and affection for the same scholars who - in their view - used to be the "the scholars of women's menses and impurities". When they have come to terms with this, then inshaa'allaah we can open up a discussion concerning Imaam, Takfir, Irjaa and the position of Imaam al-Albani and Imaam Ibn Baaz - both of whom the Qutubis accuse of being Murji'ah, and having the Irjaa' of Jahm Ibn Safwaan - due to their position on ruling by other than what Allaah has revealed.